The Regents table is all over the place on responding to the way they characterize the state audit report on UC admissions
The LA Times calls it frets http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-uc-regents-audit-snap-story.html
But that was before this morning when the faculty rep at the Regents table characterized the state auditors findings much more harshly...
Are UC Admin trying to use a soft touch with pols while the faculty throw themselves out there with a more aggressive approach?
"Sacramento lawmaker would expand UC resident enrollment by 30,000
Plan would take six years to add Californians, reduce nonresident enrollment
Would combine state funding with UC efficiencies, nonresident tuition hike
Caught off-guard by proposal, UC expresses initial opposition"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article76804622.html
University Of California Considers Expanding Student-Athlete Protections
UC President Napolitano proposes multi-year support for undocumented students
- Richard Blum (AGAIN!)
- Wm. De La Pena
- Gareth Elliott
- George Kieffer
- Sherry Lansing (AGAIN!)
- Monica Lozano (AGAIN!)
- Hadi Makarechian
- Eloy Ortiz Oakley
- Norman Pattiz (AGAIN!)
- John A. Pérez
- Bonnie Reiss
- Richard Sherman
- Bruce Varner
- Charlene Zettel
- Marcela Ramirez
- UC Regents Committees
- Staff Advisors, Faculty Reps, Designates
- Ex Officio UC Regents
- UC Alumni Regents
"If the University were a business, it would likely be the largest corporation in California."
"If The University Were A Business, It Would Likely Be The Largest Corporation In California"-Regents Minutes (2010)