Tuesday, September 13, 2016

A Higher Ed Sugar Tangle - what does UC do when...

See:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sugar-harvard-scandal-nutrition-study_us_57d8088ee4b0aa4b722c6417?section=&
Includes:

"The sugar industry paid scientists to pad research to support its interests in the 1960s, according to a paper published Monday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Author Cristin Kearns University of California, San Francisco uncovered damning letters in the basement of Harvard University that revealed that two of the school’s most famous nutritionists collaborated with the sugar industry to downplay sugar’s role in coronary heart disease.

The collaboration “delayed the development of a scientific consensus on sugar-heart disease for decades,” coauthor Stanton Glantz, a professor at the UCSF, told STAT."

And includes a list with this item::

"Pom Wonderful’s bogus health claims

Pom Wonderful’s pomegranate juice packs a mean 32 grams of sugar in every 8-ounce serving, but the company has long promoted the product as a health food, and advertised it with slogans like “Cheat death” and “Drink to prostate health,” according to the New York Times.

In fact, Pom spent $34 million to fund pomegranate juice research and then spun the results to make the juice look like it prevented disease. The FTC filed a complaint against the the company for deceptive and misleading advertising in 2010.

The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in 2015 that Pom would have to include a randomized, well-controlled human clinical study for any future disease benefit claims. Pom’s founders appealed to the Supreme Court, which declined to take the case and upheld the lower court’s ruling this May.

“We continue to stand behind our efforts to publicly convey valuable information about the health benefits of POM,” Steven Clark, a Pom spokesman, said in a statement."...

Then recall:

"UCLA researchers’ ties to donors called into question"


http://dailybruin.com/2014/04/24/ucla-researchers-ties-to-donors-called-into-question/

__

"The problem identified by the FTC and FDA is that Pom makes its "health in a bottle" claims in the name of marketing but dresses them up as scientifically valid. Let's see what the company-financed research actually says."


http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/05/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20101005

__

http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2013/05/food-gift-for-thought.html

"A $4 million gift to the UCLA School of Law will go toward establishing a program to study and improve food law and policy, it was announced Friday. The Resnick Program for Food Law and Policy, said to be the first program of its kind at a major law school, will explore"...
Source:
http://patch.com/california/centurycity/ucla-establishes-food-law-program

No comments:

Post a Comment