Thursday, January 12, 2017

What is OP paying for it? Why one person for that role? Why someone who has only held the job at UCLA for a li'l over a year?

UC hires first systemwide Title IX coordinator
https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/press-room/uc-hires-first-systemwide-title-ix-coordinator

Why is UCLA the epitome of Title IX for all UC? Is it? Should it be? The candidate has Ed ties to Notre Dame and U Chicago - are they the model of what Title IX should be at University of California?
-More overpaid OP bloat? Or is this position announced in advance of other findings?

See also:
https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/press-room/uc-hires-first-systemwide-title-ix-coordinator

https://www.thefire.org/single-investigator-at-ucla-means-hearings-available-only-on-appeal/

https://dailybruin.com/2015/04/09/qa-new-title-ix-officer-kathleen-salvaty-talks-future-goals-for-office/
________

And, now in this new story this section:
"Salvaty is not the first UCLA Title IX officer to go on to lead a systemwide Title IX office. Pamela Thomason, Salvaty’s predecessor, left in 2014 to become Title IX officer for the California State University system"
--A reminder of precisely that UCLA history is part of the concern.
See: http://dailybruin.com/2017/01/12/uclas-kathleen-salvaty-named-ucs-systemwide-title-ix-officer/

No comments:

Post a Comment